# Hantavirus and the COVID reflex: same fears, same hoaxes

> The hantavirus outbreak revives COVID-era reflexes: anxiety, media over-reading and recycled disinformation. A measured breakdown, with sources.

Published on May 21, 2026 on HantaTracker
Canonical source: https://hantatracker.fr/en/articles/hantavirus-covid-reflex-fear-disinformation/
Category: Décryptage

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "FAQPage",
      "mainEntity": [
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Will hantavirus become 'a new COVID'?",
          "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "No, according to infectious disease experts interviewed by NPR and according to the WHO. The difference is first biological: COVID-19 spreads through the air, enabling rapid global spread, whereas hantavirus spreads mainly through contact with the urine, faeces or saliva of infected rodents. Only one strain, the Andes virus, has documented person-to-person transmission, and it remains limited. The WHO assesses the risk to the general population as low." }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Why does the hantavirus outbreak feel like COVID?",
          "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Because the recent COVID-19 experience colours public perception, as experts explain to NPR: searches containing the word 'pandemic' are rising, anxiety surfaces on social media, and the same disinformation drivers reappear. France Info documented this recycling: Bill Gates as scapegoat, accusations against pharmaceutical companies, rhetoric minimising the virus, and conspiracy theories — all patterns already seen during the pandemic." }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "What false claims are circulating about hantavirus?",
          "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "According to France Info's Vrai ou Fake fact-checking unit (16 May 2026), several hoaxes circulate: the idea that Bill Gates 'predicted' the outbreak (he only raised the general risk of pandemics, as other health organisations did), the accusation that 'Big Pharma' staged a simulated outbreak for profit, and an antisemitic rumour claiming the word 'hanta' means 'scam' in Hebrew — which is false, the term does not come from Hebrew. These theories are recyclings of COVID-era disinformation." }
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}
</script>

A high-profile infectious outbreak, Google searches spiking, anxious videos on social media — and, almost mechanically, the **return of the same fears and the same hoaxes** as during COVID-19. The <a href="/en/glossary/hantavirus/">hantavirus</a> outbreak tied to the <a href="/en/glossary/mv-hondius/">MV Hondius</a> is no exception. A breakdown, without alarmism&nbsp;: what the experts say, and how to tell fact from fiction.

## "COVID colours everything," but this is not a new COVID

On 21 May 2026, **NPR** ran a segment on a phenomenon observed in the United States&nbsp;: the recent COVID-19 experience **shapes** how the public reacts to hantavirus and to the ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The signals described by the US public radio are telling&nbsp;: anxious questions on Reddit, videos on TikTok and Instagram, and a **rise in searches** containing the word "pandemic" on Google Trends.

But the infectious disease experts interviewed by NPR are categorical&nbsp;: the average American **should not** fear that hantavirus or Ebola will become "a repeat of COVID-19." The reason is first **biological**&nbsp;:

- **COVID-19**, like measles, spreads **through the air** — hence its lightning global spread&nbsp;;
- **Ebola** spreads through **bodily fluids** (blood, vomit)&nbsp;;
- **hantavirus** most often spreads through **contact with the urine, faeces or saliva** of infected rodents. Only one strain, the <a href="/en/glossary/andes-virus/">Andes virus</a>, has documented <a href="/en/glossary/person-to-person-transmission/">person-to-person transmission</a> — and it remains limited.

This difference in **transmission route** explains why a virus can kill and yet not cause a global airborne pandemic. It is also the consistent line of the <a href="/en/glossary/who/">WHO</a>, which has repeatedly said the risk to the general population is **low** and that this is **not** "another COVID."

## The return of hoaxes, copy-paste style

Where the comparison with 2020 is most striking is on **disinformation**. **France Info's Vrai ou Fake** fact-checking unit documented, on 16 May 2026, a genuine **recycling** of COVID-era theories. Four drivers recur, all **debunked**&nbsp;:

**1. Bill Gates as scapegoat.** A rumour claims the billionaire "already knew" hantavirus would follow COVID. In reality, the vaccine alliance he funds had for years flagged hantavirus… as it did Ebola, chikungunya and yellow fever — **already known** viruses. No "crystal ball," then&nbsp;: the same accusation targeted Gates during COVID.

**2. Accusations against "Big Pharma."** According to another theory, media and politicians "overdo it" with a "trashy virus" to enrich drug companies. The same suspicion of "global coordination" for industry profit circulated widely in 2020-2022. (France Info separately checked the claim that a vaccine is "already" on sale&nbsp;: there is to date **no licensed vaccine** against the Andes virus — see our [article on vaccine research](/en/articles/andes-hantavirus-vaccine-research-status/).)

**3. The "reassurance" rhetoric.** The mirror image of the above&nbsp;: minimising the virus to denounce a "media-political panic." It features figures already active during COVID.

**4. Antisemitic theories.** One hoax claims "hanta" means "scam" in Hebrew, suggesting a "fake virus" orchestrated by someone. This is **entirely false**&nbsp;: the word "hantavirus" does not come from Hebrew (it derives from the **Hantan River** in Korea, where the prototype virus was identified). Here too, the pattern is a **recycling** of conspiracy tropes that appeared during the pandemic.

France Info's conclusion is sober&nbsp;: this new outbreak offers disinformers "a new opportunity to chase clicks by recycling their theories."

## "Why talk about it so much if the risk is low?"

It is the — legitimate — question raised by **France Info's ombudsman**. It deserves an honest answer, because it goes to the heart of this site's stance.

Talking about it **a lot** is not talking about it **badly**. The risk to the general population is low, and repeating that is part of informing. But a real outbreak, with deaths and an international investigation, **is** a matter of public interest. Above all, silence does not create calm&nbsp;: it lets the **vacuum fill with rumours**. Informing **with restraint** — sourced figures, a clear distinction between facts and hypotheses, a refusal of sensationalism — is precisely the antidote to the infodemic described by the WHO and fact-checkers.

It is also why phenomena such as the **rush on FFP2 masks** (demand multiplied fivefold in a week in France, per Radio France) reflect a post-COVID reflex more than a health necessity&nbsp;: French Health Minister Stéphanie Rist herself recalled that "there is no reason to wear a mask" for this virus, which does not spread like SARS-CoV-2.

## Key takeaways

- The COVID experience **colours** the perception of hantavirus, but experts (via **NPR**) and the **WHO** agree&nbsp;: it **will not** be a new COVID, primarily because the **transmission route** is different.
- **Disinformation** recycles 2020 patterns (Gates scapegoat, "Big Pharma," reassurance, antisemitism) — **all these claims are false**, as documented by **France Info Vrai ou Fake**.
- The word "hantavirus" comes from the **Hantan River** (Korea), **not** from Hebrew.
- Talking about it a lot **with restraint** is the antidote, not the problem&nbsp;: an information vacuum feeds rumours.
- Post-COVID reflexes (rush on masks) ≠ a health necessity here&nbsp;: hantavirus does not spread like COVID.

On the real state of vaccine research, read [where does vaccine research stand?](/en/articles/andes-hantavirus-vaccine-research-status/). On the contested origin theories, see [the Ushuaïa landfill and the index case](/en/articles/ushuaia-landfill-index-case/).
